|
HANDS OF A STRANGER (1962/Warner Bros.) is another version
of THE HANDS OF ORLAC story-you know, the concert pianist loses his hands in a
terrible accident and is given transplanted hands from a murderer, thus
impelling him to become a murderer as well.
It’s a great story that has not always been done
particularly well. HANDS OF A STRANGER, in my opinion, is executed very well
indeed.
I have a hard time imagining a first-class ‘A’
treatment of this plot line. You know, huge production values, big name cast,
etc. The subject matter inherently cries out for a low budget treatment with
creativity and enthusiasm substituting for cash and flash. Well-known assistant
director Newt Arnold gave directing (and in this case, writing) a try with this
1962 production. There are some wonderful noir-ish elements, particularly in the
first scene when the unknown victim with the ‘powerful hands’ is gunned down in
a mob-like killing on a deserted city street in the dead of night. There are
some striking images throughout the film, but this scene really manages to set
the tone. The dying victim’s clasping hands, clutching a streetlamp pole as he
slides to the pavement, foreshadow the gruesome action to come.
If there is a flaw to this film it is that some of
the acting is pretty one-dimensional. Arguably the actors didn’t have much to
work with in terms of character development. Yet I found the writing
interesting. While working within the horror genre, Mr. Arnold managed to make
astute observations about the role of the artist in society, the aesthetics of
beauty and the moral dilemmas faced by the principal characters as they made
decisions that affected others as well as themselves.
What struck me about this film is that it seemed to
be a labour of love. There’s a stunning backdrop of a wind-blown, leafless tree
on the stage where the concert pianist performs what proves to be his last
concert. The tree resembles a clutching hand. Hands figure prominently in both
dialogue and imagery. This attention to detail, to the central imagery of the
piece, indicates a concerted effort to make the film as ‘artistic’ as
circumstances would allow.
Look for a young Sally Kellerman in a later scene in
the film. She is the only name I recognized in the cast. Although the
protagonists could have been better played, there is almost an expectation of,
shall we say, limited acting ability expected in films such as this which seems
to add to their charm. It was not ‘bad acting’ to the point of distraction, thus
pulling focus from the story. It was more like you recognized the limitations of
some of the performers but accepted them within the genre and style of film.
Nonetheless the HANDS OF A STRANGER more than makes
up for this weakness with it’s pacing, shooting style (except for dialogue
scenes, which looked a little stilted), lighting and art direction.
There is one story element I questioned. The concert
pianist murders those around him who participated in his accident and subsequent
transplant. Perhaps there would have greater plot development if he had gone
after the murderers of the owner of his ‘second-hand’ hands.
HANDS OF A STRANGER is available from Woody Wise at
Discount Video and it is well worth the purchase if you like B movies. The
combination of horror/noir works very well in this case. There are some
genuinely suspenseful moments and even if you watch this film with a nostalgic
smile on your face, as I did, (although I hadn’t seen this film before) you are
left with a sense of ‘they don’t make them like this anymore’.
I don’t see the point of a ratings system. You
either like a film or you don’t. The important thing is to know why you
like/dislike it. Our critical faculties in this day and age are sadly underused
for the most part. While we tend to understand ratings, compared to LAWRENCE OF
ARABIA, HANDS OF A STRANGER is a minor film. And yet I thoroughly enjoyed it and
have no hesitancy in recommending it. Some younger readers may be turned off by
the fact that it is in black and white. Well-here’s hoping you outgrow that
prejudice. Good black and white films have a quality many colour films do not.
They seem more composed in their imagery. You’ve all seen the video box that
says at the top ‘In glorious black and white’. I couldn’t agree more!
For a great little black and white, suspenseful,
artful, creative, imaginative and thoroughly enjoyable film, rent/buy HANDS OF A
STRANGER. I’m glad I did.
Jon Ted Wynne
|